save and grow with an electronic newsletter
|
|
Distribute your own electronic newsletter without the limitations and restrictions of third party e-mail marketing and distribution services. Contact COCO+CO. to learn how to create a custom program for your company.
|
your 2009 challenge: “tenacity”
|
|
“COCO+CO. challenges its client
partners to demonstrate tenacity in 2009,” said
President and Chief Executive Officer Tim Coco. “Chances
are your business won’t be receiving a bailout, low/no
interest loan or a stock purchase from the government.
There’s a certain pride, however, in knowing
you did it alone. Put your chin
up and dig in. You’re going to make it and be stronger for your efforts.” Bring your
employees, customers and vendors into the mix. Tell them
what you are doing to survive and grow. In fact, download the “Tenacity Challenge” poster
by clicking here
and display it proudly.
|
COCO COntact
|
|
COCO COntact aims to provide sound
advice, share information about the investments COCO+CO.
is making to help client partners and relay a few unabashed “I told you so’s.”
Greater Boston:
189 Ward Hill Avenue Ward Hill, MA 01835
Voice:
978.374.1900
Facsimile:
978.521.4636
Toll-Free:
800.374.4103
www.cocoboston.com
|
|
 |
Businesses
fail when marketing and operations are working against
one another
.
the marketing/operations
disconnect
reassembling the
broken pieces or ‘denial
is
not
a river in Egypt’
Part 5 of 5
|
about this series
Part 1: Overview of the marketing/operations
disconnect Part 2: Prospect, we hardly knew
ye Part
3: Customer service: “warm and fuzzy” or
“take a number?” Part
4: Customers who’d rather be
“outta here” Part 5: Reassembling the broken
pieces | Editor’s
Note: Earlier this year, COCO+CO. sought to
discover why a marketing program at one company generated $100
million in new business, while a similar program at a
substantially comparable firm was an abject failure.
COCO+CO.’s “Beneficial Benchmarks” revealed startling
disconnects between what certain businesses believe they offer
and what end-users actually experience.
Your business is losing credibility,
customers and money.
Yes, it is.
Since this series began, readers have
voiced agreement that every business but theirs
has
debilitating disconnects between what marketing promises and what operations delivers. COCO+CO. has
been challenged by readers to identify any such flaws
at their organizations.
As
Sherlock Holmes said,
“It is a capital mistake to theorize in advance of the facts.”
Consider what occurred when trying to communicate with some
of these businesses.
-
A return call to one business owner
revealed all messages were being inadvertently forwarded to
a general voice mail box that had not been checked in weeks.
When the messages were finally retrieved, many were from
prospects responding to a recent advertising
campaign.
-
An inquiry of directory assistance to
find one caller’s business telephone number found the
organization is not listed (It turns out the number is
published under the company’s virtually unknown corporate
name).
-
An e-mail reply to one challenger was
returned as “spam.” The company’s Internet service provider
recently tightened security so much that virtually all
e-mail was being returned, including common customer
inquiries.
-
One letter received was carefully
prepared on beautiful stationery – obviously designed to
impress, but was crumpled in order to be squeezed into an
obviously undersized envelope with the company’s former
address scratched off it.
-
A visit to one business’ Web site for
information revealed no contact data whatsoever and no forms
with which to send an inquiry. A receptionist later
explained the owner was trying to discourage annoying calls
from salespersons, but forgot customers and prospects might
also need to contact the business.
-
An attempt to drive to one business
was thwarted by a huge ice barrier at the company’s entrance
that obviously accumulated over the last month or so.
Apparently no one noticed customers doing U-turns and
leaving without conducting any transactions.
The above disconnects are mostly
communications-related. What other issues are occurring within
these businesses? COCO+CO. called
one contractor to schedule a common
repair. The call was answered courteously, but two months
later without a repair, the contractor obviously lost
track of the
order. The owner,
who
has been quoted
in the media as blaming the economy for his woes, apparently does
not want to believe there may be other flaws
in his operation.
Economic conditions are obviously less
than ideal, but this is precisely
the reason you should work harder, improve systems and
deliver better service. There will be survivors when
the downturn ends
and perhaps your
business
should at least
make an attempt to be one of them. Too many managers and
employees assume they won’t be making sales and are
inadvertently discouraging them.
An area restaurant, for example,
convinced itself business inevitably
would be down and moved to
cut staff, close earlier, trim customer “extras” and preserve
cash by ceasing to advertise its low-cost lunches.
Not surprisingly, income
is tanking while
McDonald’s
just posted huge
profits in excess of Wall Street estimates. There are some products and
offers that actually sell better during recessions. Tell the
public about yours.
You expected this article to list steps you should
take to fix marketing/operations disconnects at your business. Okay,
here are four:
-
Get out of denial. You have
disconnects. Everyone does.
-
Pretend you are a prospect. Call and
e-mail your own company. Visit your Web site. Eavesdrop to
learn how your salespeople conduct themselves in-person and
on the telephone. Drive through your parking areas.
-
Address the disconnects you find. Use
commonsense.
-
Repeat as often as
necessary.
To learn more about
COCO+CO.’s “Beneficial Benchmarks,” call (800) 374-4103 or
(978) 374-1900. Submit your comments to creative@cocoboston.com.
‘handoff’ risks stymie
companies
Remember the terms “Business Process
Reengineering” and “Total Quality Management (TQM)?”
Supporters in the 1990s exclaimed these new methods were not
fads, but instead “new ways of life.”
Guess what? They
were fads. However, one tenet of reengineering – the
need to reduce handoffs continues
to have merit.
That is, the greater
the number of handoffs between employees
or between companies and vendors, the greater the costs in
money, security and customer satisfaction.
“Eliminating handoffs means doing away
with the errors, delays and rework that they engender. Bell
Atlantic, forerunner of Verizon, for example, reduced the time
it takes to install a high-speed digital service link from
thirty days to three; in some instances it now takes only
several hours. Moreover, because the new process generates
fewer errors and misunderstandings, the company doesn’t need
additional
people to find and
fix them,” authors Michael Hammer and
James Champy wrote in their 1993 book, “Reengineering the Corporation:
A Manifesto for Business Revolution.”
Its full ostentatious name aside, the
reengineering concept had merits. While the book was a
fantastic success, it wasn’t embraced by
rank and file workers
for several reasons. First, many of
these business concepts were perverted into meaning something corporate heads
could use to justify layoffs.
Second, it was hard to keep a straight
face while leaders babbled about “radical redesign of a
company’s processes, organization, and culture
to achieve a quantum
leap in performance.” It was the
latest fancy sounding and hackneyed blah blah blah to reach
corporate boardrooms and, worse, restrooms.
your values, culture and money at
stake
Some real-life handoff examples may hit
close to home. Let’s say you outsourced a particular function
to a vendor who also outsourced to a vendor who further
outsourced the job. Don’t scoff. You probably already
have a number of these arrangements. The vendor actually doing
the work is so far removed from your company’s values and
culture that mistakes and miscommunication are common. Not
only are you paying for more corrections, you are paying each
vendor’s markup.
The task is time-consuming
and costly. Should any one of
these vendors fail, you are too far removed from the
end product to salvage much.
Last October, for example, thousands of
Web sites went down when AlphaRed of Houston, Texas, abruptly
closed its doors and later filed for
Chapter 7 liquidation. Most
companies with affected Web sites didn’t
even know they were hosted by AlphaRed since they were
outsourced by their outsourced vendor.
You may not be aware how many steps
away you are from your own systems, but it is a good idea to
find out. With companies failing daily, your risks are too
great. Add to this, what happens to your confidential records
when a subcontractor you have been heretofore unaware of is
disassembled in bankruptcy? Are your security, confidentiality
and non-compete agreements even enforceable that far down the
line? Consider this, AlphaRed went down in flames as it was
being accused by law enforcement officials of distributing
“scareware,” software that made Windows XP users falsely
believe that their registry
had become “damaged and corrupted.” What
would your customers and prospects think of you if your
site distributed the false scares?
For a free evaluation of your Web
and marketing-related handoffs, call (800) 374-4103 or
(978) 374-1900. Submit your comments to creative@cocoboston.com.
.
|
 |